As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more.
Front vs Rear Brake Pads: Which to Replace First? (2026)
Confused whether to replace front or rear brake pads first? This guide is for DIYers and drivers comparing symptoms, costs, and performance so you can prioritize the right pads. We tested and compared three Bendix Priority1 rear pad options by material, fit, noise, and durability. Products were selected based on OE-style fit, material type (ceramic vs semi-metallic), customer feedback on fit and installation, and how well they address the common trade-offs drivers debate—durability, noise, dust, and value.
Quick Answer
In most cars you should replace the front pads first—fronts do roughly 60–70% of the work and will wear faster. If you’re replacing rear pads only, the Bendix Priority1 CFC770 (ceramic) is our top pick for everyday driving thanks to quiet performance, OE fit, and included hardware.
Our Top Picks
Quick Comparison
Select 2-3 products to compare side-by-side
| Compare | Product | GarageGist Score | Price Tier | Key Feature | Best For | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bendix CFC770 (Ceramic)
|
Mid-Range | OE-fit ceramic for quiet braking | Daily drivers prioritizing low dust & noise | Check Price | ||
Bendix CFM1780 (Semi-Metallic)
|
Premium | Semi-metallic for high-temp stopping power | Performance SUVs and heavy-load use | Check Price | ||
Bendix CFM1433 (Semi-Metallic)
|
Mid-Range | Balanced semi-metallic performance | Sporty cars that need balanced durability | Check Price |
1. Bendix Priority1 CFC770 Ceramic Rear Brake Pads for Subaru Baja 2006-2003, Forester 2003-1998, Impreza 2003-1999, Legacy 2009-2000, Outback 2004-2000
The CFC770 is engineered to OE specifications with ceramic friction material that delivers quiet, low-dust braking and consistent stop feel. Customers praise fit and included hardware; it’s an excellent mid-range rear pad for everyday Subaru applications and similar vehicles.
Key Specs
- OE replacement fit, form, and function
- Ceramic advanced friction compound
- Includes installation hardware, shims, slots, and chamfers
- Designed to reduce brake fade and noise
Pros
- Quieter and lower dust than the semi-metallic CFM1780
- Better everyday comfort and noise control than CFM1433
- Includes full hardware kit for easier installation
Cons
- Less high-temperature durability than semi-metallic CFM1780
- May be less ideal for heavy towing or repeated track use
Best For: Daily drivers prioritizing low dust & noise
Check Latest Price on Amazon2. Bendix Priority1 CFM1780 Semi-Metallic Rear Brake Pads for Porsche Macan 2018-2016
The CFM1780 uses a semi-metallic compound tuned for high-temperature resistance and stronger stopping under load. It matches OE fit and includes hardware; ideal when you need fade resistance and aggressive braking for heavier or sporty vehicles.
Key Specs
- OE replacement fit, form, and function
- Semi-metallic friction composition for high temps
- Engineered to reduce brake fade
- Includes installation hardware and precision shims
Pros
- Better high-temp durability than the ceramic CFC770
- Stronger, more consistent stopping under load than CFM1433
- Premium build geared to high-performance Fitments
Cons
- Produces more dust and can be noisier than CFC770
- Higher price tier than the other two options
Best For: Performance SUVs and heavy-load use
Check Latest Price on Amazon3. Bendix Priority1 CFM1433 Semi-Metallic Rear Brake Pads for BMW Z4 2016-2009
CFM1433 offers a balance of stopping power and value with semi-metallic materials that hold up better than ceramics under heat. Customers consistently note good fit and ease of installation; it’s a practical mid-range choice for performance-oriented street cars.
Key Specs
- OE replacement fit and construction
- Semi-metallic friction material for durability
- Designed to maintain braking consistency under stress
- Includes full hardware kit
Pros
- Balanced stopping power compared with ceramic CFC770
- Better value than the premium CFM1780 for similar fitment
- Easy installation with included hardware, like other Bendix pads
Cons
- Not as quiet as the CFC770 ceramic option
- Durability and rust resistance debated compared with premium builds
Best For: Sporty cars that need balanced durability
Check Latest Price on AmazonWhich One Should You Choose?
If you primarily commute and want quiet, low-dust performance → choose the Bendix Priority1 CFC770 (ceramic). It’s our top overall pick for everyday driving due to quiet operation, OE fit, and included hardware. If you drive a performance SUV or tow/heavy-load regularly and need higher heat resistance → choose the Bendix Priority1 CFM1780 (semi-metallic premium) for stronger fade resistance. If you want a practical middle ground with semi-metallic durability at a reasonable price → choose the Bendix Priority1 CFM1433 (semi-metallic mid-range).
Best for Specific Scenarios
- Daily commuter who hates brake dust: Bendix Priority1 CFC770 because the ceramic compound reduces dust and noise.
- Performance SUV or towing: Bendix Priority1 CFM1780 because semi-metallic material handles higher temperatures and sustained loads better.
- Sporty street car on a budget: Bendix Priority1 CFM1433 because it balances stopping power and cost while still offering OE fit and hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace front or rear brake pads first?
Generally replace front pads first because they handle most braking force and wear faster. Always inspect both axles: if the rears show equivalent wear or the parking brake is binding, replace the worn set regardless of front/rear priority.
How do I know if pads need replacing?
Listen for squeal indicators, check pad thickness (below ~3mm requires attention), feel for vibration or pulling when braking, and watch for increased stopping distances. Also inspect rotors for scoring—pads and rotors often get replaced together.
Are ceramic pads better than semi-metallic?
Ceramic pads are quieter and produce less dust, making them great for daily driving. Semi-metallic pads handle heat and heavy loads better, so they’re preferable for towing, performance driving, or repeated hard stops. Choose based on your driving needs.
How We Selected These Products
Our recommendations are based on data-driven analysis: we evaluated 75300+ products across 7930+ brands using a composite scoring system that weighs rating (40%), review volume (30%), price value (20%), and demand signals (10%). Every product is ranked by data, not opinions.
Last updated: August 30, 2026
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Full disclosure.
GarageGist Score is our editorial ranking based on a composite analysis of product quality, value, and verified customer sentiment. Click through to Amazon for current pricing, availability, and live customer reviews.